Newport Beach Criminal Defense Attorney
Newport Beach Criminal Defense Lawyer Attorney Profile Case Evaluation Case Results Contact Us
Criminal Defense Areas of Practice
Criminal Defense
Assault
Battery
Burglary
Domestic Violence
Drug Crimes
DUI
Expungements
Hit and Run
Internet Crimes
Juvenile Crimes
Pre-File Investigations
Probation Violation
Rape
Sex Crimes
Shoplifting
The Court Process
Theft Crimes
Vehicular Manslaughter
Violent Crimes
Warrants
White Collar Crimes
En Español
Instantly connect to our office View our blog

CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL HOLDS THAT INSERTING A KEY IN DOOR OF A RESIDENCE WITHOUT A WARRANT DOES NOT VIOLATE THE FOURTH AMENDMENT

In People v. Robinson, the defendant made an alleged assault on a police officer and abandoned his vehicle. Leaving his keys behind, the police officers followed defendant's expended gun cartridges and tested the keys. One of the keys fit into the door of a residence and without obtaining a warrant, police found heroin, marijuana, additional ammunition, and drug packaging materials. On appeal, the defendant contended that the evidence found in the home was inadmissible because the warrantless entry of the home was unlawful and therefore all evidence during that illegal search was inadmissible.

The independent source doctrine says in order for evidence to be admissible, it must have been discovered by means wholly independent of any constitutional violation. People v. Weiss (1999) Cal.4th 1073, 1077-78. Where the probable cause for a search warrant contains information obtained by unlawful conduct, the courts apply a two-part test.

  1. The affidavit must be sufficient to establish probable cause without the information obtained through the unlawful conduct; and

  1. The police would have subjectively sought the warrant even without the information that was obtained illegally.

Whether the warrant was supported by probable cause under the independent source doctrine depends upon whether the act of inserting a key into the door violated the Fourth Amendment. The court determined that inserting the key into the lock, even if it constituted a search, was not unreasonable and thus not violative of the Fourth Amendment. The court did not decide whether inserting the key into door was a search but assuming it was, the search was based on "reasonable suspicion" and "served legitimate investigative purposes. Because the search was not unreasonable and did not violate the Fourth Amendment, the information gained was therefore found to be admissible.

Scott Hughes is a criminal defense attorney in Orange County, California practicing in State and Federal Court.

Categories: Criminal Defense
Social Networking
Attorney Web Design The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Address: 620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1100, Newport Beach, CA 92660